Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Not so young anymore.'s avatar

Ouch. This is so painful. As I have posted my professional org has gone rogue.

Expand full comment
Hippiesq's avatar

There is no answer to the question posed other than laziness followed up by a desire to protect themselves from liability for what they already endorsed (aka selfish cowardice). It's another peanut allergy story, but with even more severe, wide-ranging consequences.

I hope the Supreme Court is able to see through their bluster, obfuscation, clever word-play, attempts to paint themselves as the righteous defenders of gender atypical children and distressed teens (when they are, in fact, the ones causing harm to these children and teens) and their plain old idiocy.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts